Essay on vicarious liability

When is an employer not vicariously liable

Review this essay: Please note that the above text is only a preview of this essay. Under this law, the liability of any tort committed by an employee that falls under the scope of his duties to the employer is transferred to the employer. To initiate, one must be acquainted with instances in which employers are or are not liable for a claim if hostile environment based on sexual harassment and sex discrimination. I also owe my sincere thanks to the library staff, National Law University for the cooperation and facility extended from time to time during the progress of my project work. One day Sue walked into the lunchroom of the business. Foundations of tortuous liability, fault liability, strict liability, principles of insurance in torts. Employees also need to be aware of what the company expects of them when performing their job. In the following paragraphs we will discuss areas of Agency Law and how it applies to the employer, agent and employee. Such a case would require them to prove that the two acted outside their spelt Related Documents Essay The Liability Of The Employer The notion of liability of the employer is the secondary analysis made regarding hostile environment. If you use part of this page in your own work, you need to provide a citation, as follows: Essay Sauce, Vicarious liability. This law is founded on the basis that a person committing a tort should be held liable for the same and should be made to pay for it Andrews, The reason for vicarious liability is to allow the injured parties to have better means of recovering their damages as employers …show more content… I can therefore, decide to sue the resort on whose interests Rex and Tex were acting either acting as agents or employees. The new test was, therefore, by definition more effective than the Salmond test for determining the circumstances in which it is just to hold an employer vicariously liable for the unauthorised acts of his employee. Ellerth, is who is the alleged offender, a co-worker or a supervisor?

The term required the employee to exercise diligence and skills at work. This improvement was achieved by the simple expedient of explicitly incorporating the concept of justice into the close connection test.

Likewise, managing the enforcers can be equally if not more challenging. Strict liability is the placing of liability upon the defendant sregardless of whether or not mens rea is present.

Essay on vicarious liability

The new test was, therefore, by definition more effective than the Salmond test for determining the circumstances in which it is just to hold an employer vicariously liable for the unauthorised acts of his employee. It now means a breach of some duty independent of contract giving rise to a civil cause of action and for which compensation is recoverable. In the law of tort, there are two parties, including plaintiff and defendant. The signing parties should observe the terms and conditions until the expiration of the contract, or end date Business Dictionary, The Supreme Court ruled that The Institute of Brothers should be held liable along with the organisation who employed the teachers. Respondents v Securicor Transport Ltd. The employer should have regulations that ensured such accidents did not happen and as the employee was still doing his job and helping the business then the employer should take the blame as if it was the other way around they would reap the benefits of this employees work. Review this essay: Please note that the above text is only a preview of this essay. Essay about Tort Of Negligence And Vicarious Liability - In this essay we are able to identify the Law of tort and present a case from New Zealand covering tort of negligence and vicarious liability. This case involved whether The Institute of Brothers should be held vicariously liable for the teachers from their institute being involved with abusing the children that they were teaching, even though it was not them who had employed the teachers, the employing was done by an outside organisation. Before this case, intentional torts were not considered for vicarious liability. This includes both the intentional and unintentional torts. Such a case would require them to prove that the two acted outside their spelt Related Documents Essay The Liability Of The Employer The notion of liability of the employer is the secondary analysis made regarding hostile environment. In that endeavour, first and foremost I would express my gratitude toward my professor of Law of Torts Ms Manjula Batra.

In this case a tanker driver was delivering petrol to a garage and while the storage tank was being filled, lit a cigarette and threw away a lighted match causing an explosion. This establishes that even though the Institute and the teachers did not have a direct employer-employee relationship they had a similar relationship that meant the Institute could be held in tort.

Based on this law, the resort can seek indemnification from Tex and Rex.

trotman v north yorkshire county council

My participation in the ride was advised by the resort, which advertised the event as peaceful, scenic ride that would allow me enjoy the panoramic vistas of the desert.

Rated 9/10 based on 33 review
Download
(PDF) tort law